Monday, February 20, 2012
If I could still write openly on this blog, which is not to say I am expressly forbidden to do so...
But, if I could, let's say, comfortably cut down on the candor with which I had become accustomed
And also, if I could feel less "potentially" or "arguably biased" in describing what I would personally like to see or hear from potential leaders of our association
Or, if I could confidentially write about the brain racking uncertainty of waiting to hear back about a possible faculty interview
Or, if I could articulate how challenging a decision is between a hypothetical academic life versus an "offer on the table" clinical reality in the perfect geographic location
Or, if it were appropriate to openly discuss the perceived and/or actual ceiling in place within academia for a not quite New Professional without a PhD taking a faculty position
Or, if you could poll a group of New Professionals regarding the ideal class size for PT students in a changing health care education landscape without stepping on the toes of a potential employer's ever expanding PT program
well then I would write about those things. But, arguably, I can't. So I won't. Wouldn't be appropriate... for me.
And for goodness sake, someone please offer to take the reigns of the Move It Blog! I'm dying to see it grow and be relevant to the newest New Professionals without all my geriatric ranting and raving!
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
I apologize for the long delay between posts around here! It has been a very, very busy year. APTA elections are just around the corner and I've been devoting a good deal of time to my efforts on that front. And of course, with elections come this year's House of Delegates which marks the gathering of the highest governing body of our profession.
I'm very proud to be a part of this year's House. Just to name a few, we will be tackling issues such the profession's role in end of life care, the possibility that it's time for PTs to bring on additional extenders beyond PTAs, and reflecting on how Vision 2020 is evolving and could be changed. The House is a place of great passion and enthusiasm. It is endlessly satisfying to see so many PTs and PTAs lively advocate for what they feel is the right course.
This blog has always been about questioning what is known, be that assumptions regarding new PTs, philosophies about where we are headed as a profession, or even just the present state of health in society. The microcosm of ideas, musing, and rants here on Move It represent a different way of viewing our profession and reflections on common situations that New Professionals seem to find ourselves in.
So it is with great appreciation and admiration for all of Move It's readers and contributors, that I must make a confession. My New Professional card has been revoked. Ten days ago I officially eclipsed the 5 year mark. From this point on, I hope to serve as a guest author only for the blog. Fresh perspectives will be coming soon! Stay tuned and thank you again for your readership!
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Without a doubt, the need and demand for our services will increase in the coming years. If we don't seek to disrupt ourselves, someone else will.
Innovation is about capitalizing on areas in which newer, quicker, cheaper, and better options exist. In many ways, PT evolved to disrupt the western medical model in place for the hundred or so years prior.
If we fail to see that as part of our pedigree, it's a sad state of affairs. Sad for us because we will lose ground in the next shake up. But it would be great for the next generation of lower cost, more consumer-savvy providers.
If we want to stay on top, here are my suggestions:
Step one: Acknowledge that not every problem requires a PT.
We have a diverse and widely applicable skill set but we can't be everywhere all the time. There are some jobs that ATCs, exercise physiologists, health coaches, and nutritionists may do better. If you can't handle hearing that, okay, but be ready to have our association spread too thin across too many uphill battles... This means looking at PT-PTA relationships and PT-XYZ relationships as well. As a profession, and rightly so, we are anti-kick back. But as demand increases we will need to put the lab back in collaboration. Which brings me to-
Step two: Forge alliances with the individuals next in line to "disrupt" the system.
This is no small list. Point of care is moving out of the hospital and out of the Doctor's office. For us, it's moving out of the clinic... Nurses were set up to be big winners in Health Care Reform. That is certainly a strategic alliance that needs our attention. PTAs, ATCs, SPTs, Massage therapists, and a laundry list of others deserve constructive consideration as well.
Step three: Re-evaluate which jobs we set out to do.
If an ATC proves they can rehab an ACL better than we can, sigh, maybe we should get out of that business. Do I expect that to happen? No. Is it possible? Perhaps?? If we aren't asking ourselves the question, we open ourselves to being blindsided by unexpected answers. As I've said in the past, comparative effectiveness studies are exciting opportunities to prove our expertise and rally public support behind endeavors in which we choose to take on a leadership role. Could the APTA registry in the works be used for the greater good? I certainly hope so. Why not fund it and fast track it?
Step four: Innovate. Move "to where the puck is going to be."
If PTs seek to 'own' just two major areas in the health care arena, they should be obesity and aging related neuromusculoskeletal deterioration. Soon 80% of Americans would qualify for PT intervention based on one, the other, or both categories. Where are our community based intervention courses for aging and physical therapist interventions? Where is the hot bed at which PT and Public Health intersect?
As always, thanks for reading! There's been a brief hiatus as I've been managing some family issues and gearing up for APTA elections. This is a cross post with the EIM Blog. But there will be some Move It exclusives up soon.
Thursday, March 31, 2011
I think we can all agree that RESEARCH ROCKS . . . but how do we keep up with it all?!?! As a physical therapy student, I vowed to myself that I would “always” keep up with the latest research once I entered the working world. Journals, continuing education, conferences . . . I was going to do it all. Once classes, exams, papers and group projects were done, I thought I would have plenty of time to keep up with the research world. How could I possibly be busier than I was as a physical therapy student?!?!
After five years of working as a physical therapist, these thoughts make me laugh :-). I have come to realize that staying up-to-date with the latest research findings is a very personal and challenging journey for each of us. Finding a balance between family, friends, recreational activities and work can be demanding. With so many people, responsibilities, and activities filling each day, finding time to stay in touch with the research world can be difficult. It has taken me a few years of trial and error to figure out what works best for me. Here’s what I do:
· Skimming journal cover pages (JOSPT for example) as soon as I get them and highlighting the articles that are most relevant to the patients I am seeing currently. This helps me prioritize me reading/learning.
· Reading journal articles two days a week during lunch . . . often while riding a recumbent stationary bike. Starting to do this really helped me keep up with my journal reading.
· Attending continuing education courses and PT conferences as regularly as I can given time and $ constraints.
o Looking up journal articles cited by presenters at courses and conferences
o “Open Door” which is available to all APTA members is a great resource for finding journal articles in publications that you don't already receive
· Journal club – I work as one of two physical therapists at a university student health center. Putting together a journal club took some extra planning because our “Sports Medicine” journal club includes physical therapists, an athletic trainer, and primary care physicians. We meet once a month to discuss new articles and to work on our overall system of patient care.
· Talking “shop” with PT friends . . . sharing what we have learned
So fellow NPs, how do you do it? How do you keep up with the latest research while balancing family, friend, work, etc? I'd love some new ideas!
Monday, March 7, 2011
Emory's event built upon and went beyond past efforts. PASS imagined the future. VRTP established strategic goals. On Saturday, with the help of an APTA lobbyist straight from D.C. and with the Chief Disability and Health Officer from the CDC, we began to compare the current state of affairs with our goals as a profession. To borrow from Capitol Hill, this was a big "frickin" deal... ahem. (Not bad for what was initially a simple Alumni weekend and Foundation Fundraiser.)
Exploring the Future was about initiating change in the PT world. Ivory towers, silos, bloated curricula, exorbitant debt, disconnected scientists, and disinterested clinicians were all on the chopping block. The audience was engaged and asked to reflect on how change can happen and where change is needed. Topics ranged from ACOs to regenerative medicine to innovative co-pay incentivization schema. Comments ranged from "Translational clinicians need to be honored within APTA." to "If you don't donate to the Political Action Committee, at least marry a congress person."
The seemingly obligatory product of Symposiums these days is the White Paper. While such a paper is in fact forthcoming, there was a strong call throughout the event to take action beyond the keyboard. Hopefully bloggers are granted free license in this regard. No blog of any readable length could do this day long event justice. So I want to share a personal perspective that grew out of PASS and was strengthened over the weekend.
Physical therapists must come to lead community initiatives. Our skill set has expanded in many helpful areas but the need for our skill set has exponentially out accelerated that growth. Patient demographics have become population statistics. As clinicians, researchers, and just professionals, our reach needs to extend further now than ever. My personal mission, having attended PASS and presented in Exploring the Future as young leader, is to promote a skill acquisition model for leadership development within APTA. The sooner we identify the societal needs of 2020 and beyond, the better we will be able to "skate to where the puck will be" by preparing our clinicians and leaders to meet those challenges. Where do you think the puck is going?
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Once upon a time, a time long, long ago, when I was only contemplating sitting for my NCS and not counting down the days until I would take the most expensive and difficult test of my life, I registered for a preconference course at the Combined Sections Meeting. The course was entitled "Laying the Foundation for Expert Practice in Neurological PT". A prominent theme of this course was differentiating between "intuitive" and "systematic" processing. We were taught that experts were able to synthesize information intuitively without investing cognitive resources in differentiating between plausible and implausible hypotheses. This ability was thought to improve efficiency and allow an expert to focus on an individual's complaints.
I'll be honest. I found this distinction frustrating in its over simplicity. Experts will inevitably be more efficient in processing information gathered from their patients. (If they weren't, we'd have a problem.) But in the world of Physical Therapy, everything is data collection, every touch, every question. Saying that something is intuitive makes light of the empirical process going on beneath the surface. New grads think in terms of T-tests, whereas experts conduct ANOVA.
So granted, there is a difference in the way information is processed. But whether it's an expert clinician performing an evaluation or an NP assessing gait, hypothesis testing is the bread and butter of physical therapy. Anything that obscures this fact contributes to the unfortunate divide between research and practice in our field.
Researchers assess whether or not a particular practice works. They are "practicing" to see if it works. Clinicians test hypotheses with every modification to a treatment plan. Why, then, is there such an inexplicable divide between clinicians and researchers? My hypothesis: the methodological family tree split too long ago. The clinical language is different because there hasn't been an IRB looming in the background. Standardization wasn't required. But in the context of the emerging health care paradigm, in which comparative effectiveness and clinician scorecards will evolve, a common bench/bedside language will be indispensable. Our branches must re-form a central trunk.
Where do you see the Clinic and Lab colliding? And for the future, if we don't strengthen those connections, how will we survive?